2006 Indy

As we race towards the 90th running of the Indianapolis 500 the landscape of open wheel racing may be getting ready to change. Talks between the IRL and Champ Car have been taking place and both sides have acknowledged as much. Where those talks lead us is likely to shape the future of the sport or doom the sport to no future.

We all know the history of the war between the former CART and the IRL. Tony George felt slighted when he was offered a non voting seat on the CART board. George had a “vision” to get the open wheel world back to its North American roots of oval racing and to develop those young sprint and midget drivers eventually leading them to Indy and try to keep some of them from bolting to NASCAR.

We all know of the infamous 25/8 which was hastily abandoned, albeit a little too late. We know the “vision” has changed several times. We know that neither the IRL nor CART/OWRS/CC is able to draw any TV ratings and that the IRL has suffered from poor attendance. In fact, the once venerable race at Phoenix is now completely gone from the schedule after drawing about 8000 fans last year. Phoenix used to be the race before Indy and the winner was usually the favorite when the track opened in May. We know that CC has all but abandoned oval racing and for that matter, road course racing for street racing. We also know that Long Beach and Monaco are the only ones who really can pull that off. We also know that driving a front engine midget or sprint car lends itself much more to the front engine NASCAR cars than it does to the rear-engine, more nimble and faster Indy Car, thus making the whole point of the original “vision” moot.
All of these are points the fans of open wheel racing, or should I say Indy Car racing (be it IRL or CC) have come to grips with. We also have heard the past couple of years about a possible unification of the two series, but they ended up being smoke and mirrors. At least this time the parties involved are admitting to talks.

But where do we go with these talks? IRL fan is certainly not going to stand for a schedule even half and half oval/road course. CC fan may never return if it goes oval heavy. I have posted my dream season at Indystar.com so I will eschew doing it in detail here, but suffice it to say some of the tracks in the IRL will have to go away just as some from the CC schedule. I think it is imperative to be in Canada at least once and preferably twice and I’d like to see the series in Mexico once. As long as Honda is involved I think you have to keep Motegi. I’ve never been a big fan of the Australia race so as far as I am concerned it can go. Europe? Forget it.

As for the cars, well I will leave that to those who know about such matters. Frankly, it matters little if the cars are turbocharged or normally aspirated.

The biggest issue to me is who is going to run the show? This isn’t the NFL/NBA/MLB so a commissioner in that traditional sense won’t work in my opinion. Racing is a different animal. Drivers can and do get hurt bad or killed. Of course people get killed doing all sorts of jobs, but racing has an inherent danger not found in other sports. If a team suffers a streak of bad luck with injuries/deaths they will leave. Then again if teams suffer lack of funding they will leave. Looking down the pit lane this past weekend at Indianapolis gives me hope that the sponsors are coming back, but I wonder if it is proportionately the same to sponsor a car as it was in 1995. CC is really hurting for sponsors so unification may not exactly set the open wheel financial world on fire.

When CART was formed the team owners wanted the power and the say so. When I think about that it is hard to find fault with it. It is their asses on the line. Still it is wrong when some of those owners also decide to be promoters at their tracks and even worse when races are guided to tracks purposely because of an owner.

The commissioner in CART never worked because he was a puppet to the owners and there weren’t two sides such as labor and management in the traditional stick and ball sports. Unfortunately the owners in this high stakes game rarely agree on anything. Ultimately CART went under and lots of people lost a lot of money. Was it mismanagement or simply a matter of trying to corral owners who did not want to be corralled?
ext bring on the IRL. Tony George had the track, he made the rules and he ran the shows. I thought he was acting low budget, but he isn’t very smart and needed help that he must have refused. Face it, everyone and their brother knew TG was subsidizing teams in the IRL and especially in the 500. He tried to get out of it one year by proclaiming “33 is just a number”. Had he mumbled that in front of a crowd of race fans he probably would not have survived the day. He was stuck then subsidizing teams to bring the count to 33 for the Memorial Day weekend classic.

Apparently tired of doing that, he started his own team. Vision Racing! My question is how is this any different than what was happening in CART? A lot of people are still convinced Paul Tracy won the 2002 Indianapolis 500 and that George unilaterally ruled against him. IF and it is a big IF at this point, one of his cars was involved in a similar situation, how would he act? Even if Barnhart were to rule, he is in lock step with TG so how would he rule?

These are issues that have to be resolved, but rest assured, I hope they do resolve them and get this thing back together. In 1995 the track was packed on race day, now we have many areas with empty seats and scalper prices are at an all time low. Each year the Speedway talks about ticket sales being up, but it certainly is not evident.

Face it, the race ain’t as big of a deal as she once was. It can recover, but greed, paranoia and mistrust have to be taken out of the equation to make it happen.